Mission

1-Week Critique (1WC) is a digital editing studio, which aims to provide literary education and pedagogical support to writers, whatever genre they are operating in, whatever their level of formal education, and regardless of the means by which they have found themselves compelled towards the literary arts. 

 

1WC began in 2019, as a collaboration between editor and poet friends seeking to take part in and cooperatively develop honest, supportive and art-focused literary communities, open to the insights of writers from all backgrounds, experiences, and media. 

 

As our name suggests, 1WC’s first and ongoing editorial service program allows writers of poetry and prose to submit short work, which is responded to by one of our editors within seven days. 

 

While individualized editing remains the tried-and-true mainstay of our work, 1WC continues to experiment with, in order to establish, best practices for literary pedagogy. 

 

We continue to adapt and expand as the studio develops new and changing relationships. Our current and forthcoming list of programs includes:

 

Editorial Services

    Feedback on a single piece of Poetry or Prose a week or less

    

    For longer works (i.e. long-form poems and complete manuscripts) please reach out to       our editorial staff

    

The Interview Series 

    An ongoing discussion of the development of individual works with their authors 

 

Teaching Takeaways 

 

    Curated writing prompts in conjunction with relevant historical context and author                biographies

 

StoryTalk 

    A roundtable discussion, focusing on one piece of fiction at a time 

 

Appreciations 

    Forthcoming 

 

Please note that a few of our program offerings are for-pay or are “behind the pay wall.” Our ultimate goal is to make resources available to the widest possible audience. As a small organization—small in human power and resources—we aren’t yet able to provide all our services for free, though, with the volunteer and financial support of friends, grant-givers, fellow writers and other patrons, we are increasingly able to expand our outreach and share our work with a wider community. If you have questions about our model, we welcome them via our email. If you’d like to support our programs, please reach out via our email, or visit our Donate or Patreon pages. 

1WC.png

Editorial Vision

The purpose of 1-Week Critique is to provide feedback on poetry or prose. As an alternative to BFA/MFA/PhD programs in creative writing (multiyear ventures), online writing workshops (of varying length and commitment levels), or other feedback-driven writing groups (such as online forums or in-person community-based gatherings), 1-Week Critique offers thorough feedback to submitters within one week. 

 

Most journals offer publication or rejection without much commentary either way. Acceptances often contain praise but little in-depth reasoning. Rejections usually consist of either a stock rejection letter (sent to the majority of submitters) or a more personal rejection that notes a poem or story that was a contender but did not reach the level of acceptance. Personal rejections do sometimes include specific, though not often lengthy, explanations. This can be frustrating, baffling, to writers, particularly if they don’t have strong support (i.e., a thoughtful writing program or group to turn to).

 

Many literary magazines ask writers to familiarize themselves with representative samples of work they accept. This is predominantly achieved by reviewing online journals, select digital samples, a recent print issue, etc. While this advice is generally useful, completing background research for each journal takes time and yet, it can still be difficult to fully comprehend editorial decisions (whether positive or negative). Certainly, this phenomenon may be due to a number of possible factors: continual staff turnover, themed issues, opaque guidelines, private editorial staff meetings, etc. 

 

Maybe the most difficult obstacle related to creative writing is subjectivity. As a writer it seems impossible to objectively see some of the weaknesses in your own writing, yet someone else can quickly and easily point out areas that could use improvement or pose questions for the writer concerning the direction the work appears to be interested in pursuing. This is where 1-Week Critique proposes to be valuable: a more objective option for writers interested in quick feedback. 

 

A claim of complete objectivity is probably impossible; however, it is our goal to remain objective and provide incisive, clear and timely responses.

 

1-Week Critique offers extensive feedback on one poem or story at a time. A writer may submit a draft of a single poem or story. Separate options are available depending on the length of the piece (see appropriate genre guidelines). The poem is read, considered, and responded to within seven days. A response will consist of: 

 

  1. how the piece is operating: 

    1. the evident concerns of the piece

    2. rhetorical strategies the piece incorporates to convey these concerns

    3. ultimately, the connotations inherent in the work 

 

  2.   areas of strength

          1. consists of an analysis of why/how an area is perceived as strong
          2. may include suggestions for incorporating this elsewhere throughout the piece

  3.  areas of weakness

          1. consists of an analysis of why/how an area is perceived as weak 

          2. may include suggestions for possible improvement 

  4.  writers or works that may be of interest to read/study 

  5.  a recommendation on how to improve the piece or questions to consider in revision

Thorough feedback to submitters within one week. 

For writers of any level, be they beginners or masters. 

Our goal is to remain objective and provide incisive, clear and timely responses.

Pieces are read, considered, and responded to within 7 days.